It’s back to the drawing board for Provco Goodman, L.P., the firm looking to develop a Wawa at the now-vacant parcel near the corner of Baeder, Hilltop and Old York roads.
The Abington Planning Commission shot down its request to amend the zoning ordinance for the area that would allow for certain uses including a fuel filling station and fueling signs. The area is currently zoned “PB,” planned business, and Provco Goodman wishes to build a Wawa, replete with 12 gas pumps and a bank on the parcel.
Though the planning commission is just an advisory panel, should the commission have approved the ordinance, it would have gone before the board of commissioners for consideration.
Planning Commission Chairman Ronald Rosen lauded Bruce Goodman’s plans for the development of the site, saying they were aesthetically pleasing, but said he was uncomfortable approving the ordinance without a formal, independent traffic study.
The applicant will re-apply – with the traffic study in hand – at the November Planning Commission meeting.
Last night's 3 hour-plus meeting was standing-room only. Many residents voiced their opposition to the development. Strangely, many of them liked the idea of having a larger Wawa in the area, but they were turned off by the traffic the development would create in the surrounding neighborhoods.
During the presentation, Goodman’s attorney, Michael Savona, described the proposed plan. The development would include a Wawa store, 12 gas pumps and a bank or other financial structure near the southern tip of the parcel — closer to the corner of Baeder and Hilltop roads.
“The era of old-fashioned service stations and convenience stores is becoming a thing of the past,” Savona said. “All Wawas are changing to a combined, modern use [and] Abington does not have a use for modern industry in [areas zoned as Planned Business.] This location is right for redevelopment and it’s a perfect location for this type of use.”
Savona said the Abington Economic Development Committee is unanimously in favor of the development and said that he and his client have had extensive talks with PennDOT.
The development would also include a major redesign of that intersection, including a dedicated traffic light for Hilltop Road traffic.
Traffic looking to leave the Wawa and head north on Old York Road would exit onto Hilltop Road; there would likely be signage restricting vehicles from making a right-hand turn on Hilltop Road. Traffic driving on northbound Old York Road would be able to make a left turn directly into the Wawa.
See the photos.
Abington Police Officer Al Freed said the plans for the intersection redesign were “excellent” and “awesome.” He added that the redesign would eliminate 80 to 90 percent of the complaints he receives regarding that intersection.
A traffic expert representing Provco Goodman said there have been 52 crashes at the intersection of Baeder and Old York roads according to the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation in the past five years.
--
Provco Goodman, L.P. submitted an application to the Abington Zoning Hearing Board for the site late last year, but later withdrew it. The amendment to the zoning ordinance brought before the planning commission last night was completely penned by Provco Goodman, L.P.
Planning commission members John Weggel and James Egbert said the proposed amendment to the ordinance was restrictive to any further development. They specifically pointed to a provision that reads: "Motor Vehicle Fueling Centers must be located on property which is within 800 linear feet of a public rail transportation station.”
See the whole document in the pdf section above.
Weggel called the proposed amendment “spot zoning," and Egbert called it "extremely restrictive." Goodman said he was “not trying to have a monopoly on gas stations.”
Resident and developer Bruce Toll also took issue with some of the provisions in the proposed amendment.
According to Goodman, Toll lost the bid for the property to him.
--
THIS IS THE WRONG DEVELOPEMENT FOR THIS PROPERTY.
Mr. Goodman bought this property knowing how it was zoned. He made the buisness decision to do that on his own. For that matter all property owners, residential and commerical, bought their properties with the understanding that this is a PB property that will not have a 24/7 business on it. Mr. Goodman is trying to change the zoning on this site to have a 24/7 business. Why should Mr. Goodman get to write a new ordinance that only benefits one commerical property owner (himself) at the expense of his neighbors, the residential property owners? We are all for developing this property with the correct type of business. The bank is a good idea, it is not a 24/7 business. It is time for Mr. Goodman to find a tenant for his property that is not a 24/7 business. And to note, I love Wawa. I think they are a great company. It is too bad that this specific site restricts a 24/7 Super Wawa from being built there. To change an Abington property code that was put in place to protect residential properties would be a shame. Protecting residential property owners rights is one reason why Abington is one of the best places to live in the US.
I agree that Mr. Goodman put together a good presentation. Too bad his plan does not meet the PB code for his property. I would love to see a plan that meets the requirements of the commerical property he decided to buy. I am sorry to say that I disagee with you about Ms. Lehmann, I believe some of her points are very valid. Greg
24/7 Gas - We may not have this, but I do know that the BP Gas Station (next to Kitchen Bar) about a mile north of this proposed site has gas late, at least until Midnight, maybe later. They keep their pumps operating late. I know I haven't heard anyone asking for 24/7 food since we already have it. As for 24/7 gas I have never heard anyone say that they think Jenkintown/Abington needs 12 lanes of 24/7 gas. It really is amazing that we have gotten by this long without that. As for new job creation, it is nonexistent with this development plan. The 24/7 Wawa employees will be relocated to the new location, no new jobs. The bank that is proposed would also be a relocation per Mr. Goodman's presentation, since his current bank tenant at another location is looking to move, no new jobs. The only new jobs would be construction jobs, but that will be created no matter what business is built. Lets work towards new job creation by finding businesses that don't already exist locally and meet the codes of the property Mr. Goodman decided to purchase knowing the property's code restrictions.
The bad news is that I was a little off on the distance from the proposed 24/7 Wawa site, it is actually 1.3 miles, not 1 mile. Also the store/office at this BP is only open 7am-10pm. So when you do go for your late night gas, don't forget your credit card. So please spread the word to everyone that Abington has 24/7 food and 24/7 gas on the 611 corridor!! Isn't this great news? Now Mr. Goodman can really focus his attention on bringing true new business to our township, not business that is already here. That would be some great job creation. Not only that, but he can find businesses that meet the codes of his property and his neighbors' properties. I would now like to quote my Abington High School 10th grade science teacher, Mr. Raeder (sp?), "isn't this sooo totally cool?".
Also, that space was a gas station before, what's the objection to it being a gas station again? Most gas stations have stores in them, the WaWa is more or less an upgrade version of that.
I am all for development of this land, but this land is not coded for a 24/7 business. I feel for the neigbors of this property who bought their homes knowing that their neighbor was zone for planned business, but they also bought knowing that their neighbor was not going to be a 24/7 business. Why should one commerical land owner get to rewrite the code of the land he decided to purchase (he knew the codes) to benefit greatly at the expense of his residential neighbors? And I am not against a gas station, I loved the Texaco and went there often, it wasn't a 24/7 business, I am against a 24/7 operation. The property is not zoned for it because it shares property lines with residential properties, it is writen in the Planned Business code. No more quiet summer nights for these neighbors if Mr. Goodman gets his way. He has written his own ordinance that is pretty specifc to this property. Just doesn't seem right to me, Mr. Goodman will benefit greatly while good long standing Abington residents lose.
I stand firmly with Greg Pennekamp on this issue .
what iam looking at the fact that abington twp is not business friendly , which leads to have no tax base or employment . Does goodman have the right to sue the township for property he can not develop ? If so that also will hurt me the citizen of this township. Where does it end?