patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

HLRA Approves Air Base Plan

The federal government is expected to accept the plan within two years, with land transfer expected in three years.

A new future for shuttered Willow Grove air base was drafted Wednesday afternoon with the Horsham Land Reuse Authority’s approval of its long-awaited redevelopment plan.

The culmination of six years of work on behalf of the nine-member board, the public in terms of comments and, for the last year, the HLRA’s consultant, RKG Associates, the sixth version of a massive mixed use redevelopment plan for 862 acres of the 1,100-acre property will now be forwarded onto the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 

“I think this vote really needs a drum roll,” HLRA board member and former Warminster Township Supervisor Donnamarie Davis said moments before a vote was taken. “If anybody thinks there hasn’t been enough time and effort put into this vote, you’re really sadly mistaken.”

Board member Steven Nelson, Montgomery County commissioners’ director of policy, a proponent for the previously rejected airport option, cast the lone “no” vote. Board member Joanna Furia was not present.

Prior to voting, Nelson said he felt “very uneasy” voting on the plan because he did not feel it adequately addressed traffic issues. 

“We’ve got a project here that’s bigger than the borough of Hatboro,” Nelson said.

HLRA Executive Director Mike McGee said he is working with PennDOT, the county and the federal government to undertake a “significant” regional traffic study. McGee said he was confident federal grants would be made available.

“I’m hoping that no one is expecting the future owners of this property to take care of all existing conditions,” McGee said of traffic congestion.

Next steps

Following the local vote, McGee told Patch that HUD is expected to take 60 days to review the plan and accompanying homeless housing application. From there, McGee said the Navy will spend the next 18 months “or more” on an environmental impact statement.

The previously designated hot spots undergoing remediation – approximately 30 acres in all – will factor into that statement, McGee said. The property would not be transferred from the federal government until the “sensitive” areas are either cleaned up, or until entities are designated to carry out necessary cleanup, McGee said.

Robert Lewandowski, Navy Base Realignment and Closure environmental coordinator told Patch in May that remediation got underway 11 years ago and some cleanup could continue for the next 10 years.

McGee estimated that the federal government would “accept” the redevelopment plan within about two years. The first land transfer would occur about three years from now, McGee said.

Unlike past HLRA meetings where an airport was at play, the three dozen or so in attendance Wednesday remained mostly silent throughout the public comment portion. David Pitcairn, whose late uncle, aviator Harold F. Pitcairn had owned much of the base property before the military, criticized the board for counting on “nebulous” grants for traffic purposes – but not an airport.

Pitcairn also urged the board to consider letting the Delaware Valley Historical Aircraft Association use the existing hangar for their purposes.

“It just seems a much better use of space if that building becomes part of the museum,” Pitcairn said.

McGee said part of a yet-to-be-completed infrastructure analysis would examine demolition costs, which he said would likely be absorbed by the authority and prorated to property owners and entities.

“It’s our estimation that there’s not one building on that property that will be of any value two or three years from now … and able to come up to code,” McGee said. “Nothing was built to code.”

The plan

Option F, the final redevelopment plan, includes 1,416 mixed-use residences, a 13-acre aviation museum, a 40-acre middle school, a robust town center and regional recreational area and 70 townhomes for the homeless. A 133-acre office park is expected to create more than 7,000 jobs – and a $457 million annual payroll - upon build out, officials said previously.

It could take 20 or more years to complete the entire development, officials have said. 

Related Topics: HLRA, Horsham land reuse authority, Real Estate, Redevelopment, and Willow Grove air Base

tedtaylor

9:55 am on Friday, March 23, 2012

Maybe if there's a crisis in the future they can land airplanes on the new golf course. Homeless housing, a golf course, a plan that really isn't a plan., 20-30 years until done, knocking down buildings left-and-right, wow we must be awash in tax dollars to spend. Who is in charge here? Anyone?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob

12:35 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

Maybe a surtax could be added on new properties and buildings on the base until it is paid off. Also a extra wage tax could be added to workers and residents of the housing and businesses once the base is reused.

Bob

12:34 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

Maybe a surtax could be added on new properties and buildings on the base until it is paid off. Also a extra wage tax could be added to workers and residents of the housing and businesses once the base is reused.

Reply

tedtaylor

12:47 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

That'll never happen because that would be selective taxation and keep people and businesses away. Better chance that taxes go up for everyone in Horsham. What a kick in the behind that'll be.

Reply

Mike Shortall

3:47 pm on Tuesday, March 27, 2012

Well done! Now we can move on to the next phase.

People here who repeat the same complaints over and over aren't really paying attention. This redevelopment will take decades before its completed. So many aspects of the plan will have to change based on markets and interested investors.

The destruction of the buildings on the base cannot be avoided. The Navy put absolutely nothing into the facilities there ever since the BRAC decision was made. Those buildings are already damaged beyond use due to neglect.

I'm not going back into the whole homeless thing, since they don't bother listening.

Taxes would have to go up if an airport was located there, since the BCCA offered all of $5,000.00 per year (not a misprint!) for the privilege and the School District stands to lose $800,000 per year in Impact Funds from the Federal Government!

Reply

EC

7:12 pm on Wednesday, April 11, 2012

I'm glad I won't be living in Horsham any longer once this plan goes into effect. It is already far to congested and adding 1400 plus homes plus 7000 commuters is a recipe for disaster. It should have stayed an airport.

Reply

bob

9:04 am on Sunday, May 27, 2012

Got rid of the Aircraft....Here comes the traffic lights. The only ones to blame are the people who move into the community then say I didn't know there was an airport here. These are the people who at every air show bitched and complained to anyone who would listen. If you are one of them I hope you are stuck in traffic for eternity!
People of Horsham YOU WILL REGRET THIS!

Reply

mac

5:37 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012

Sad to say this but there will not be any revenues from this land for @ 10 years to come. And right now we get to view weeds and run down areas that are a disgrace. Not to mention that when it is mowed we must be paying major tax dollars for that to happen. So we are already looking at expenses without revenue to pay for them. In the long run an airport might have been the answer to quick turn around income. And I think there would have been support for this had people not been blindsided by those who could not see the benefits of an aviation school and mechanic jobs which could already be in place. But more overcrowded housing and business space not needed. there are already way to many empty. ride through the business campuses in this township. And housing people can't afford mortgages, so will they all be rentals? And who will get the construction jobs? Probably those who already own a good deal of horsham and don't upkeep the properties they now own.

Reply

Leave a comment