It should be emphasized that Ms. DiJoseph decried her perception that I had spoken "for a half hour" [when, actually, I had consumed--due to her 3-minute rule--far less time], reflecting the fact that Ii had created discomfiture. And this was before i had lambasted Herder, Jr. for having filed a "joinder" to the submission of Marc B. Kaplin, Esquire; at-issue is the [Watergate] classic "what did you know and when did you know it?" [amplified, here, to include "when did you remit a copy of the paperwork?"]. Previously, only the deceit of the latter had been spotlighted; now, they are both being challenged for having violated their responsibility to serve as "officers of the court."

The specific issue is why the "Doctrine of Laches" was knowingly violated by Brandolini; for Herder had unambiguously informed Kaplin of the 6/15/2011 hearing PRIOR thereto [which Herder told Judge Del Ricci and myself, in chambers]; a subsequent filing by Kaplin [who probably wasn't informed of this admission] claimed he'd only learned of the existence of this litigation AFTER 6/15/2011...and the most recent filing claims Herder only told him thereof on the night prior.

This is a :delicious" taste of the judicial system that is being punctured by this pro-se litigant, absent support from community organizations/individuals. The battle continues, but the Commissioners will ultimately have to take responsibility for their [in]actions...and "reminders" will constantly be emitted....

I ran in the GOP primary against an incumbent who I felt lacked credibility...and lost by 37 votes...a decade ago; Marcel Groen can fill-you-in regarding the details.

I do not relish the need to function pro-se but, like Cincinnatus, I will not shirk from duty...particularly when others knowingly fail to uphold their responsibilities.

And, BTW, know that the 3-minute rule has been ignored when others have spoken; for whatever reason, my input is perceived as distasteful...so sad.

Plus I'm sure that it doesn't help that, as the adage goes, "A lawyer who represents himself has a fool for a client."

I can understand your frustration with the process and your dislike of the deals that are in the works, but I don't agree that seemingly endless lawsuits are always the way to go.

Our friend Art Larson was just on here the past few days seemingly bragging about the 250 lawsuits and $1.5 Million he has spent in legal fees fighting the government. Seems like all it's doing is wasting taxpayer dollars having to fight one single person who wants to drag everything to court when a vote doesn't go his way.

perhaps instead of citing glib euphemisms and anecdotal diatribes, you should derive conclusions following a review of the facts; all relevant filings are uploaded on "scribd"